Int J Angiol 2022; 31(03): 179-187
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1755573
Invited Article

Massive Embolism: Knife versus PCI

Scarlett Tohme
1   Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York
2   Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York
,
1   Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York
2   Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York
,
Christopher Gasparis
2   Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York
,
1   Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York
2   Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York
› Author Affiliations
Preview

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism is the third most common cardiovascular syndrome with an estimated up to 25% of patients presenting with sudden death. For those who survive, a mainstay of management for patients with hemodynamic stability is anticoagulation; however, recommendations and options are rapidly changing for patients with submassive or massive pulmonary embolism with hemodynamic instability. Catheter-based and surgical approaches offer efficacious management options for unstable patients or patients with contraindications to anticoagulation; however, both approaches have inherent benefits and risk. This article seeks to offer a brief review on the recommendations and options for management of pulmonary embolism from both surgical and catheter-based perspectives.



Publication History

Article published online:
20 August 2022

© 2022. International College of Angiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA